Scores at a Glance
Coco Palm ResortSerenity at Coconut Bay
Overall
8.0
9.3
Beach
·
8.0
Value
8.4
8.1
Romance
·
9.7
Scores out of 10 · higher is better
Quick Stats
| Coco Palm Resort | Measure | Serenity at Coconut Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 | Overall Score | 9.3 (better) |
| 5-star | Star Rating | 5-star |
| 4.3 (1,109) | Google Rating | 4.9 (287) (better) |
| From $89 | Price / Night (pp) | Rates TBD |
| No | Adults Only | Yes |
| – | Kids' Club | – |
| Near coast | Beachfront | Near coast |
| Mid-size | Resort Size | Mid-size |
| 75 min | Airport Transfer | 5 min (better) |
All Scores
| Coco Palm Resort | Measure | Serenity at Coconut Bay |
|---|---|---|
| – | Beach | 8.0 |
| (better)8.4 | Value | 8.1 |
| – | Romance | 9.7 |
| 8.3 | Nightlife | – |
| 6.8 | Quiet | – |
Of the 4 measures we call, Coco Palm Resort leads on 1 and Serenity at Coconut Bay leads on 3.
Vibes
| Coco Palm Resort | Measure | Serenity at Coconut Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Lively | – |
| – | Romance | Yes |
Activities
| Coco Palm Resort | Measure | Serenity at Coconut Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Nightlife | – |
| Yes | Kids | – |
| – | Spa | Yes |
| – | Water sports | Yes |
Coco Palm Resort
- 1 pools
- 1 restaurants & bars
- Swim-up suites
- 75 min from UVF
Serenity at Coconut Bay
- Adults-only all-inclusive
- 1 pools
- 9 restaurants & bars
- Full-service spa
- Butler service
- 5 min from UVF
Pros · Coco Palm Resort
- Excellent Rodney Bay location
- Flexible optional all-inclusive rate plans
- Boutique scale
- Walkable to Reduit Beach and nightlife
Pros · Serenity at Coconut Bay
- Exceptional private-suite setup
- Butler service included
- Very short UVF transfer
- Quiet couples-only environment
Cons · Coco Palm Resort
- Not beachfront
- Limited on-site restaurant count
- Some nightlife noise risk
- Not a luxury mega-resort
Cons · Serenity at Coconut Bay
- Expensive
- Not a nightlife-forward resort
- Beach quality is not as defining as the room product
- Small-resort quiet may not suit highly social travelers
Keep exploring
Similar resorts
Not these two?